I've played both classes and I'm currently sticking with my ranger. So rangers. Good heal, bolas, nice damage and all in all a very fun class to play.
Plus tanking on my warrior is pretty expensive and its not as fun as my ranger. I also find levelling on my ranger a whole lot easier (solo levelling)
Re: Ranger vs Warrior which wins?
#12Yeah I think rangers are better and Im a warrior :/...
DUBSIDIA
First Warrior to Lvl 190 on server!
General of Revenge
"It's all fun and games until someone loses the lock"
First Warrior to Lvl 190 on server!
General of Revenge
"It's all fun and games until someone loses the lock"
Re: Ranger vs Warrior which wins?
#13Thanks for all the input!!
Gwydion:
Astraea - ranger
Prophetess - druid
Astraea - ranger
Prophetess - druid
Re: Ranger vs Warrior which wins?
#14Rangers are more fun and better to play
Name:Woox16:Warrior:level:190
Name:Ocilley:Druid:level:180
Name:Supremacy:Ranger:level:155
Name:Gage:Mage:level:75
World:Danu
Clan:Prime
Name:Ocilley:Druid:level:180
Name:Supremacy:Ranger:level:155
Name:Gage:Mage:level:75
World:Danu
Clan:Prime
Re: Ranger vs Warrior which wins?
#15A. Ranger all the wayi am looking to start a new character. I asked around on which to class to do and Warrior and Ranger kept coming up. I would like to know:
A. Which is better for soloing?
B. Which is better for dps?
C. Which has better surviability? (I am guessing warrior)
D. Which is better for training?
E. Which is more fun all around?
Thanks
B. Ranger, if go you got the right gear
C. In bosses, warriors. Lvling, rangers.
D. Rangers
E. Yes, rangers FTW
Sorry man, ur high.
A- warrior
B- rogue
C-warrior
D-rogue
E- any can be fun
-Hard work beats talent when talent doest work hard-
Re: Ranger vs Warrior which wins?
#16I'm high? Ur the one high.... First of all, Idk why u put rogue in there when he said Ranger and Warrior.... Secondly, ranger has more all round survivability(light heal, fast movement, bolas), you get my point. Out of both, ranger is the most fun. Yes I know you are a lvl 150+ ranger, but tbh I don't care what you think. You don't quote people on these topics. You state your own opinion. Now go kill some Boggans and trolls.A. Ranger all the wayi am looking to start a new character. I asked around on which to class to do and Warrior and Ranger kept coming up. I would like to know:
A. Which is better for soloing?
B. Which is better for dps?
C. Which has better surviability? (I am guessing warrior)
D. Which is better for training?
E. Which is more fun all around?
Thanks
B. Ranger, if go you got the right gear
C. In bosses, warriors. Lvling, rangers.
D. Rangers
E. Yes, rangers FTW
Sorry man, ur high.
A- warrior
B- rogue
C-warrior
D-rogue
E- any can be fun
World- Sulis
FrostKnight- LVL 222 Ranger
FrostDagger- LVL 198 Rogue
Sancus- LVL 197 Mage
FrostKnight- LVL 222 Ranger
FrostDagger- LVL 198 Rogue
Sancus- LVL 197 Mage
Re: Ranger vs Warrior which wins?
#17yeah but healing is a drag and continually casting bolas takes too long -.-
warriors are best for lvling
good armor = less healing
warriors are best for lvling
good armor = less healing
Danu:
Deathreaver - level 136 Warrior
Flametongue - level 62 Mage
Deathreaver - level 136 Warrior
Flametongue - level 62 Mage
Re: Ranger vs Warrior which wins?
#18In the current state of the game I would go with a warrior. But rangers are definately more fun. I would suggest going with a rogue or mage though.
Albericus of Herne
Lazydrunks founder
Ranger skills still broken...
Lazydrunks founder
Ranger skills still broken...
Re: Ranger vs Warrior which wins?
#19The categories you have posted are really too general to get a sufficient answer, and the question you're asking really has no definitive correct or incorrect answer. It is your preferred playing style, however ill do my best to answer you're question anyway.
Soloing: warriors are much better for faster kills (if set up correctly for solo lvling) but be prepared to wait for hp to regen between groups of mobs (unless you have good lux or plenty sigils), while rangers are much slower per kill but can go for much longer without having to regen (again, if set up correctly for solo lvling). Id say say warriors get more of a benefit per elix when soloing (on average, of course there are always exceptions) due to their ability to go through mobs faster, but rangers are more suited to solo grinding.
Dps: It depends on your enemy. For regular mobs warriors set up for dps will win over a ranger most often because of skills, but on 6* bosses with a ranger and warrior of the same level with equivalent gear and both set up for dps my money is on the ranger (on average rangers will win).
Survivability: It depends on how you look at it. The choice most people would go to is warrior because of their obvious armor and usual hp advantage, but think about this situation: put both a warrior and a ranger against goretusk (any boss without long range attack) and the ranger will be able to kill it solo, unlike the warrior who would need help.
Training: Well im not exactly sure what you mean here, but i will assume you mean which one is easier to level up in a group. Warriors are definitely more versatile when it comes to being in a group (they can be tank/dps/hybrid), but rangers can be invaluable dps, bolas, and sharpen weapons is extremely helpful to the groups kill speed. This one is more dependent on your particular world. If your world has alot of warriors but very few rangers then a ranger would be more helpful (and vice versa). If you mean which one is easier to lvl solo refer to the first section ("soloing").
Fun: Well this one is completely personally preference. I could go on for a long time tell you which class i think is more fun, but that would not help you in the least so instead ill point out some high points of each. Warriors: they are able to tank, are good in the arena, have more weapon options, decent amount of dps (unless youre a tank, in which case expect very little dmg), bulkier looking armor, and are usually vitality oriented. If you like that combination then warrior is for you. Rangers: bolas, 'quicker' type class, more dps (on average), more of a sly feel to them, less bulky armor, bows/knuckles, but dont expect to be tanking any big bosses. If you like that combination ranger is for you.
**Now before everyone starts splitting hairs saying they can do (insert random feat here) so my statement is completely wrong, let me just say this: These statements are all referring to the proclivities of each class, not the exceptions (since there are exceptions to most things). They are not meant to be rules or set in stone, but just a guideline to help better understand each class. **
Hope this helps.
Soloing: warriors are much better for faster kills (if set up correctly for solo lvling) but be prepared to wait for hp to regen between groups of mobs (unless you have good lux or plenty sigils), while rangers are much slower per kill but can go for much longer without having to regen (again, if set up correctly for solo lvling). Id say say warriors get more of a benefit per elix when soloing (on average, of course there are always exceptions) due to their ability to go through mobs faster, but rangers are more suited to solo grinding.
Dps: It depends on your enemy. For regular mobs warriors set up for dps will win over a ranger most often because of skills, but on 6* bosses with a ranger and warrior of the same level with equivalent gear and both set up for dps my money is on the ranger (on average rangers will win).
Survivability: It depends on how you look at it. The choice most people would go to is warrior because of their obvious armor and usual hp advantage, but think about this situation: put both a warrior and a ranger against goretusk (any boss without long range attack) and the ranger will be able to kill it solo, unlike the warrior who would need help.
Training: Well im not exactly sure what you mean here, but i will assume you mean which one is easier to level up in a group. Warriors are definitely more versatile when it comes to being in a group (they can be tank/dps/hybrid), but rangers can be invaluable dps, bolas, and sharpen weapons is extremely helpful to the groups kill speed. This one is more dependent on your particular world. If your world has alot of warriors but very few rangers then a ranger would be more helpful (and vice versa). If you mean which one is easier to lvl solo refer to the first section ("soloing").
Fun: Well this one is completely personally preference. I could go on for a long time tell you which class i think is more fun, but that would not help you in the least so instead ill point out some high points of each. Warriors: they are able to tank, are good in the arena, have more weapon options, decent amount of dps (unless youre a tank, in which case expect very little dmg), bulkier looking armor, and are usually vitality oriented. If you like that combination then warrior is for you. Rangers: bolas, 'quicker' type class, more dps (on average), more of a sly feel to them, less bulky armor, bows/knuckles, but dont expect to be tanking any big bosses. If you like that combination ranger is for you.
**Now before everyone starts splitting hairs saying they can do (insert random feat here) so my statement is completely wrong, let me just say this: These statements are all referring to the proclivities of each class, not the exceptions (since there are exceptions to most things). They are not meant to be rules or set in stone, but just a guideline to help better understand each class. **
Hope this helps.
Enjoy the little things in life...
One day you'll look back and realize they were the big things.
One day you'll look back and realize they were the big things.