The more rolls I do, the more accurate it will be. Will update.

This actually went over fairly well. Most people understood and there were only a few who were adamant against it (take a guess who). Nothing will really change unless the DM rolls under a 50 and then i predict all hell will break lose.Ok so we tested this earlier today for 200 5*. Here's how it went...
I Dmed for this fight.
I first announced that we are using a new dicing rule. Sorry to the participants if I did not elaborate. I was trying to make it as quick as possible and I was confident that you guys will figure the new system quite easily.
Steps I took:
1. Announced drop and then announced that I am rolling to decide whether we choose HIGHEST or LOWEST roll. I rolled an 88.
2. Since 88 is higher than 50, I then announced that HIGHEST ROLL wins.
3. Asked players to prep and roll.
4. Checked rolls. Cecil won with a 98
Quite easy. Thanks for the cooperation by the way.
how is it a hassle? if it is not needed u think people will think about it? u see the point u say how u propose it can be addressed then? ive won 18 times at 200 yet im up for this. why be afraid to try something new? perhaps u got something better u can propose? we are all ears.-1 I think its to much hassle and not needed if there is an issues thinking someone is spiking dice get them to reset there toons way to many pointless rules coming up. But I do see where your coming from you do always see the same hand full of people winning at almost every fight.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests