Celtic Heroes

because you dont use magic, you use natures magic, your class is for healing not destroying things

You are correct in that the class is made for healing. But how do you suppose we level if we can not kill things efficiently like all other classes can? The druid had 0 players over level 100 before the update while every other class had at least 5 (warrior having 24). I don't know about you nut I see a problem with this.

lol i agree with u, i just dislike it when people complain :p i think that root should be extended a bit longer (not in pvp) so druids have more of a chance to heal up, ward, buff, storms touch which is freaking insane etc

Those are things we can wish for but I do not expect to get them.

But how do you suppose we level if we can not kill things efficiently like all other classes can?

join a group with a lower lvl at heal him/her and take harder mobs u will lvl up i gained 4 lvls doing this in 1 hour

But how do you suppose we level if we can not kill things efficiently like all other classes can?

join a group with a lower lvl at heal him/her and take harder mobs u will lvl up i gained 4 lvls doing this in 1 hour

If the levels mentioned in your signature is up to date, i can assure you that I can gain atleast 25 levels in 1hr at a low level as such as yours. I don't need a training buddy. The current issue is for those higher or closer to their 90s.

The solution to our problems is one tweak: Group Exp Bonuses. Here is something non-practical, but it wud be nice also: MORE exp bonuses for grouping magic classes such as Druids and Mages. What do you think?

The solution to our problems is one tweak: Group Exp Bonuses. Here is something non-practical, but it wud be nice also: MORE exp bonuses for grouping magic classes such as Druids and Mages. What do you think?

I completely agree. In order for a druid to level he will need a leveling build and therefore wont be beneficial to boss healing. But if the xp gained in a group was increased, than it would allow a druid to remain support focused which was the whole reason for the class right?

How about if Druids gained experience for healing successfully? This would give experince ONLY for the number of HPs actually healed either on others or on self. Or possibly restrict it to healing others in groups?

I agree with most of what is written here. Druids are the toughest class to level...fact.
Storm Touch was suppose to help but that quest line is bugged or they have not released it yet... again no love for druids.

I have two ideas.

If I get help from ANY toon they have to worry about out DPSing me and taking the XP from the kill. To my limited knowledge all fights are awarded to the highest DPS group. Everyone should remember the druid days and how druids were not invited, actually shunned and spit upon. Nobody wants a druid on a ffa fight. So my suggestion would be that this become a AGGRO award instead and let heals count towards the total of winning a fight. If a druid heals or uses buffs that heal then that should go towards the total in a ffa fight. This would at least allow other toon to help us more and not worry so much about stealing the kill.

There are some +25 Totem rings that does seem to help. I have 3 now and I do notice a little increase. BUT IT IS STILL TOO LITTLE! Why not increase these rings to +50? No druid will rely on totem hit points in pvp or boss fights. Our strengths are in Natural Magic, and if you are casting all the time you are not hitting. +25 Totem Rings should be a basic Blue Ring item and then have a +50 totem ring at the Red Ring Level. For leveling this extra bonus would really help.

Again, the question is how do you help druids level without making them overpowered for pvp and boss fights?

The druid had 0 players over level 100 before the update while every other class had at least 5 (warrior having 24).

well that is not true i just checked and druids have 23+ people that are lvl 100+ not 0

The druid had 0 players over level 100 before the update while every other class had at least 5 (warrior having 24).

well that is not true i just checked and druids have 23+ people that are lvl 100+ not 0

As of today there is only one druid at number 97 in the top 100 levels and he is the only Druid over 110.
And a total of 8 Druids in the top 200.
With there being 5 different characters there should be a 20% representation of each.
Druids in the top 200 levels are at 4%.

I would say that is unbalanced.

The druid had 0 players over level 100 before the update while every other class had at least 5 (warrior having 24).

well that is not true i just checked and druids have 23+ people that are lvl 100+ not 0

Did you not read what I wrote? I believe it says BEFORE update. lol People these days...

The druid had 0 players over level 100 before the update while every other class had at least 5 (warrior having 24).

well that is not true i just checked and druids have 23+ people that are lvl 100+ not 0

As of today there is only one druid at number 97 in the top 100 levels and he is the only Druid over 110.
And a total of 8 Druids in the top 200.
With there being 5 different characters there should be a 20% representation of each.
Druids in the top 200 levels are at 4%.

I would say that is unbalanced.

And yes, statistics don't lie. I see a problem with this.